A thief sold some stolen goods to a dealer. Several weeks later, the police raided the dealer's store and arrested him. In this raid, the police seized the goods the thief sold to the dealer and a record book in which the dealer had recorded this transaction. However, at the dealer's subse quent trial for receiving stolen goods, the charges against him were dismissed when the court ruled that the search warrant had been improperly issued. The police were able to trace the stolen goods to the thief because of fingerprint identification and the information contained in the dealer's record book. At his trial, the thief made a motion to suppress the stolen goods and record book. What should the judge do?
A、Grant the motion, because the evidence is the fruit of the poisonous tree in that the search of the dealer'
B、Grant the motion, because the trial court in the dealer's case has already ruled that the evidence was impr
C、Deny the motion, because the thief has no standing to object to the search.
D、Deny the motion, because the thief's finger prints on the stolen goods were what led to his identification
发布时间：2025-08-15 21:20:03
